In November 2007 the Strasbourg-based European human rights court has ruled against the Czech Republic in a case involving Roma students who had been placed in special schools, with possible implications for other central European countries accused of similar segregation practices.

Strasbourg-based – se sídlem ve Štrasburku human rights – lidská práva court – soud to rule against – rozhodnout proti case – případ to involve – týkat se, zahrnovat Roma – Romové, romský to place – umístit possible – možný to accuseof – obvinit similar – podobný practice – postup

In a verdict delivered on Tuesday (13 November), the grand chamber of the European Court of Human Rights confirmed Prague had violated the non-discrimination principles by sending 18 persons to special schools for pupils with learning difficulties due to their Roma origin. In the explanation of its decision - adopted by judges by 13 to 4 votes - the court said that "the Czech authorities had accepted that in 1999 Roma pupils made up between 80 percent and 90 percent of the total number of pupils in some special schools and that in 2004 'large numbers' of Roma children were still being placed in special schools."

 

to deliver – doručit grand - velký, nejvyšší to confirm –potvrdit to violate – porušit special school – zvláštní škola pupil – žák learning difficulties – problémy s učením due to –kvůli, v důsledku origin – původ decision – rozhodnutí to adopt – přijmout judge – soudce authorities – úřady to make up – tvořit total number – celkové číslo still – stále to be placed – být umístěn

It added that the statistical evidence "could be regarded as sufficiently reliable and significant to give rise to a strong presumption of indirect discrimination," as well as "concerns" over the segregation that the Czech system caused. "In view of the fundamental importance of the prohibition of racial discrimination, the Grand Chamber considered that no waiver of the right not to be subjected to racial discrimination could be accepted, as it would be counter to an important public interest."

 

to add – dodat evidence – důkaz to regard as – považovat za sufficiently – dostatečně reliable – spolehlivý significant – významný to give rise to – vyvolat presumption – předpoklad indirect – nepřímý as well as – stejně tak jako concerns – obavy to cause – způsobit in view of – vzhledem k fundamental – zásadní, základní racial – rasový waiver – zřeknutí se, vzdání se čeho to be subjected to – být vystavený to accept – přijmout to be counter – být proti public interest – veřejný zájem

The judges asked the Czech Republic to pay each Roma applicant €4,000 for moral damage plus €10,000 jointly for eight-year-long court proceedings costs, while openly pointing out that Prague is not alone in showing "difficulties" with the problem among European countries. NGOs welcomed the court's decision, pointing out that the practice of racial segregation in education is widespread in Central and Eastern Europe. "The court has made clear that racial discrimination has no place in 21st century Europe," said James A. Goldston, executive director of the Open Society Justice Initiative.

judge – soudce applicant – žadatel moral damage – morální újma jointly – dohromady court proceeding – soudní řízení costs – náklady to point out – poukazovat na among – mezi NGOs –nevládní organizace to welcome – vítat practice – praxe, postup education – vzdělání widespread – rozšířený to make clear – dát jasně najevo to have no place – nemít místo executive director – výkonný ředitel

Připravuje: Markéta Frýbová