Správní právo (EN)
The Course of the Review Process
The course of the review process
Manuscripts sent to the editors go through a mutually anonymous review process before being accepted for printing. After receiving the contribution, the editors will notify the author or one of the co-authors of the contribution that it has received the contribution and whether the contribution fits the professional profile of the journal. If the contribution suits the professional focus of the journal, it is included in the review process. The editors will ask at least two members of the editorial board to prepare lecturer/review opinions, and they will then communicate their opinions to the other members at the next meeting of the editorial board. Assessments of manuscripts are not submitted for assessment to persons who are institutionally or otherwise connected to the author. The reviewers comment on the appropriateness of the publication in the magazine and evaluate the content, style and formal aspect of the text. After discussion at the Editorial Board, a conclusion is made as to whether the contribution can be published in its current form, with certain modifications or not at all. At the same time, the editorial board can recommend in which section of the magazine the article should be published. The editorial office immediately informs the authors of the outcome of the review procedure, and together with the conclusion of the editorial office, the author/author is provided with opinions as valuable feedback, which allows the text to be suitably revised and improved if necessary.
It is considered unethical to offer a manuscript to another journal during the review process.